California was more than people, who had never been there, had even dreamed. It was better than Hollywood ever portrayed it on film. In Los Angeles, in the Spring, you cold stand on the hills above the City and see the Pacific Ocean, then turn around and see snow on the San Gabriel Mountains. Crime was low because the police were not then forced to be social workers. Everything grew, all you had to do was add water,
And Ronald Reagan became Governor, beating out Moonbeam's father, incumbent Pat Brown. m/r
Article | California's Prison-Litigation Nightmare
October 30, 2013
By Heather Mac Donald
In 2009, three federal judges ordered the state to release 40,000 prisoners. Is it any wonder crime is on the rise?
California Gov. Jerry Brown and the federal judiciary are locked in a dramatic constitutional battle over control of the state’s prisons. In 2009, three federal judges issued what Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has dubbed "perhaps the most radical injunction issued by a court in our nation’s history": an order that California release up to 40,000 prisoners within two years to correct allegedly unconstitutional prison health care.
California has since spent more than $1 billion on new prison medical facilities, brought its correctional health care far above constitutional standards, and shed more inmates than are housed in all but a few states. Yet the judges show no sign of relinquishing their hold. California’s recent sharp increase in property crime—a rise eight times greater than the national average—may be one consequence of the judicial intervention.
The prisoner-release order was the culmination of two long-running lawsuits, and, in which an advocacy group representing California inmates, the Prison Law Office, challenged prison medical treatment. The attorneys alleged that understaffing and the incompetence of prison doctors resulted in serious misdiagnoses and long, sometimes fatal, waits for care.
In 2007, after years of litigation, a special three-judge panel was convened to consider the plaintiffs’ latest argument that overcrowding was now the primary source of remaining constitutional violations. The panel agreed, and in 2009 it ordered the state to bring the prison population, then at 150,118, down to 109,805. …
No comments:
Post a Comment