Interests and irritations to a guy on a red horse.
Quotes
"Fascism and communism both promise "social welfare," "social justice," and "fairness" to justify authoritarian means and extensive arbitrary and discretionary governmental powers." - F. A. Hayek"
"Life is a Bungling process and in no way educational." in James M. Cain
Jean Giraudoux who first said, “Only the mediocre are always at their best.”
If you have ten thousand regulations, you destroy all respect for the law. Sir Winston Churchill
"summum ius summa iniuria" ("More laws, more injustice.") Cicero
As Christopher Hitchens once put it, “The essence of tyranny is not iron law; it is capricious law.”
"Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." Ronald Reagan
"Law is where you buy it." Raymond Chandler
"Why did God make so many damn fools and Democrats?" Clarence Day
"If I feel like feeding squirrels to the nuts, this is the place for it." - Cluny Brown
"Oh, pshaw! When yu' can't have what you choose, yu' just choose what you have." Owen Wister "The Virginian"
Oscar Wilde said about the death scene in Little Nell, you would have to have a heart of stone not to laugh.
Thomas More's definition of government as "a conspiracy of rich men procuring their own commodities under the name and title of a commonwealth.” ~ Winston S. Churchill, A History of the English Speaking Peoples
“Laws are like cobwebs, which may catch small flies, but let wasps and hornets break through.” ~ Jonathon Swift
"the principal defect of The New York Times et al is that they're so bloody boring."
You read an article in the NY Times, it will go on and on for thousands of words and never seem to get to the goddam point! If it ever does, it will be buried near the end, especially if its facts get in the way of their left leaning writer's agenda. I might add that Mark Steyn is a fair hand at writing himself. m/r
I can't really say I knew AA Gill, although for a brief period he was
my next-door neighbor in South Kensington. He was more successful than
I, which a lot of writers are, but also more glamorous, which is
something more mysterious and less quantifiable, and on which I brooded
from my window when I spied him sauntering the sidewalk. But he was a
beautiful writer, of a kind that does not really exist in the colorless
American press. Setting aside their partisan homogeneity, the principal
defect of The New York Times et al is that they're so bloody
boring. Gill was one of those fellows you enjoyed reading on almost any
subject, and regardless of what position he took on it. Nor was he, as
is generally the case today, a newspaper man who becomes known because
he goes on TV and radio at the drop of a hat. For the most part he
eschewed the broadcast media: He was a writer who was known for his
writing.
His death at the weekend reminded me of a time in my life when you'd
leave a London restaurant late on a Saturday night and pick up the first
editions of the Sunday papers from a Tube kiosk on the way home -
because they were such marvelous reads. Even before they entered their
present death spiral, I have never felt that way about The Boston Globe or The Washington Post. As Hugh Laurie tweets:
I never met AA Gill, and cursed his name often; but he
was funny, clever, honest, and wrote terrific sentences. I will miss
him very much.
He "wrote terrific sentences". I'll bet, during his Hollywood sojourn, Hugh Laurie has never said that about any LA Times columnist.
No comments:
Post a Comment