By
Tom Knighton
December 29, 2017
I remember when a couple
friends of mine mentioned they didn't eat meat. I had made a suggestion
for a dish to try as we checked out the menu, and they simply responded
with their dietary choices. That was the entirety of that particular
exchange. After all, what do I care what they eat as long as it's not
people?
However, it seems my
friends are unusual in that regard. I keep hearing of vegans and
vegetarians who simply can't handle the idea that someone else makes
different choices.
The most recent example comes from a report
published by anti-livestock farming Farm Animal Investment Risk and
Return (FAIRR), which suggests taxing meat like we tax cigarettes.
After citing a number of environmental concerns up to and including climate change, the report asks:
Could taxation of meat products be a way to mitigate these global challenges? The pathway to taxation typically starts when there is global consensus that an activity or product harms society. This leads to an assessment of their financial costs to the public, which in turn results in support for some form of additional taxation. Taxes on tobacco, carbon and sugar have followed this playbook.
-go to links-
No comments:
Post a Comment