Pace the president, the Zimmerman case was not about Stand Your Ground laws. It was not a white-on-black episode.
But Obama could not resist scolding us as if it are all our fault for "profiling" and standing our ground. The old, waste of all our time, agenda reared its ugly head.
The reality of Race Crime was almost totally inverted by Obama. He knows he can get away with it too. The press cowers in his presence. They fear his bristling at contradictory facts. The time for true talk about Black Crime is long past due, so what did Obama do? He swept it under our rugs. He wasted all our time, encouraged more mobs and set the reality of black crime back decades. m/r
Facing Facts about Race | National Review Online
By Victor Davis Hanson July 23, 2013
Last week President Obama weighed in again on the Trayvon Martin episode. Sadly, most of what he said was wrong, both literally and ethically. ...
...
Is it ethical for the president to weigh in on a civil-rights case apparently being examined by his own Justice Department? The president knows that if it is true that African-American males are viewed suspiciously, it is probably because statistically they commit a disproportionate amount of violent crime. If that were not true, they might well be given no more attention as supposed suspects than is accorded to white, Asian, or Latino youths. Had George Zimmerman been black, he would have been, statistically at least, more likely to have shot Trayvon Martin — and statistically likewise less likely to have been tried.
Barack Obama knows that if non-African-Americans were to cease all inordinate scrutiny of young African-American males, the latters’ inordinate crime rates would probably not be affected — given other causation for disproportionate incidences of criminality. Yet should their statistical crime profiles suddenly resemble those of other racial and ethnic groups, the so-called profiling would likely cease.
The president, I think, spoke out for three reasons: 1) He is an unbound, lame-duck president, with a ruined agenda, facing mounting ethical scandals; from now on, he will say things more consonant with being a community organizer than with being a nation’s president; 2) he knows the federal civil-rights case has little merit and cannot be pursued, and thus wanted to shore up his bona fides with an aggrieved black community; and 3) as with the ginned-up “assault-weapons ban” and the claim that Republicans are waging a “war on women,” Obama knows, as a community activist, that tension can mask culpability — in his case, the utter failure to address soaring unemployment in the inner city, epidemic black murder rates, the bankruptcy of Detroit, and the ways his failed economic policies disproportionately affect inner-city youth.
-go to link-
No comments:
Post a Comment