The American Spectator : Bring Back the Duel
"...I'm fighting a duel tomorrow!..." - Capt. Harry Prendegast, "The Adventure of the Tankerville Club Scandal" ('The New Adventures of Sherlock Holmes' radio-series; 1939-1947).
What is a Duel?
A duel is a fair fight between two gentlemen which comes after one party has "demanded satisfaction" from the other party after the exchange of insults by one, or both, of the parties.
Why Duels were Fought
Reasons for fighting duels were numerous, but the main reasons were to preserve one's honour or to deal out revenge for an insult. Duels were fought between men, that is, gentlemen, who were members of wealthy or socially prominent families. In centuries past, the conduct of a single member of a family could taint and soil the reputation of the entire tree. It would give them a bad name and it would disgrace the offending member for the rest of his life. Individual honour, and still more, the honour of the family and its name, was of the utmost importance, and was to be guarded fiercely.
Such was the importance of an individual's reputation and family honour, that many gentlemen would go to great lengths, either to defend their honour, or to protect the family name. Hence, duelling, then considered the only 'manly' way to settle an argument. Think of it as 18th century machismo.
Weapons of a Duel
In theory, ANY weapon can be used to fight a duel. Anything from billiard-cues, cutlery, kegs of gunpowder - at least one French record states that a duel was fought by two men in hot-air balloons. Traditionally, however, a duel was fought with swords or (from the 17th century onwards), duelling pistols.
Duelling pistols were made by master gunsmiths, and were typically sold in pairs, to wealthy gentlemen. The pistols were (and still are) single-shot, muzzleloading flintlocks. They would come in their own case, complete with accessories, everything from rammers to powder-horns and cleaning-brushes.
There was a time (never truly legal) when Men, and a few Women, would make settlement with the threat of finality!
At least it ended up face to face and a good shot could cull the gene pool.
"...I'm fighting a duel tomorrow!..." - Capt. Harry Prendegast, "The Adventure of the Tankerville Club Scandal" ('The New Adventures of Sherlock Holmes' radio-series; 1939-1947).
What is a Duel?
A duel is a fair fight between two gentlemen which comes after one party has "demanded satisfaction" from the other party after the exchange of insults by one, or both, of the parties.
Why Duels were Fought
Reasons for fighting duels were numerous, but the main reasons were to preserve one's honour or to deal out revenge for an insult. Duels were fought between men, that is, gentlemen, who were members of wealthy or socially prominent families. In centuries past, the conduct of a single member of a family could taint and soil the reputation of the entire tree. It would give them a bad name and it would disgrace the offending member for the rest of his life. Individual honour, and still more, the honour of the family and its name, was of the utmost importance, and was to be guarded fiercely.
Such was the importance of an individual's reputation and family honour, that many gentlemen would go to great lengths, either to defend their honour, or to protect the family name. Hence, duelling, then considered the only 'manly' way to settle an argument. Think of it as 18th century machismo.
Weapons of a Duel
In theory, ANY weapon can be used to fight a duel. Anything from billiard-cues, cutlery, kegs of gunpowder - at least one French record states that a duel was fought by two men in hot-air balloons. Traditionally, however, a duel was fought with swords or (from the 17th century onwards), duelling pistols.
Duelling pistols were made by master gunsmiths, and were typically sold in pairs, to wealthy gentlemen. The pistols were (and still are) single-shot, muzzleloading flintlocks. They would come in their own case, complete with accessories, everything from rammers to powder-horns and cleaning-brushes.
How a Duel was Fought
As mentioned, a duel is a fair fight between two gentlemen. These days people think of fights as bar-brawls or full, one-on-one, street-brawls. Back in the 18th and 19th centuries, the art of proper duelling was a tangle of ettiquite, rules and manners. If you didn't play by the rules, it wasn't a proper duel.
If a gentleman insulted another, for example, calling his wife a whore, then the insulted party had the opportunity to demand a duel. If he did desire a duel, then he would typically tell the other gentleman that he would "demand satisfaction for that insult!".
If the offender refused to duel, the insulted party would accuse the man of cowardice ("Will you duel, or are you a COWARD?") If the other man desired to leave the argument with his honour intact, he would be compelled to say that he would fight the duel ("Then you will have it [satisfaction] sir!").
One rule of duelling is that it is the insulter, and not the instigator of the duel, that can select the weapons. This was only seen as being fair. Once weapons were selected (say, duelling pistols), then a time and a place would be selected for the duel. With the date agreed on, the two men would head their separate ways.
On the date of the duel, both parties were expected to show up, with their pistols loaded and ready. A flintlock pistol is an inaccurate weapon at best. It is slow to reload and has a range of only a few dozen yards, if that. After loading their weapons, the two men would stand back to back, while a second (each man had a 'second', that is, a companion to the duel), would count out the number of paces. A rule of thumb was that the greater the insult - the fewer the paces.
After the paces had been counted, it was up to the men to turn around and fire. If they both missed, they could reload and try again. If one was hit, the injured (or dead) man, lost the duel. Firing to miss DELIBERATELY, was a breech of the rules and the duel was disqualified.
Duelling with swords (which was common even after pistols became the favoured weapon), could be done to three different stages:
1. To first blood.
The duel would start and continue until one opponent was cut badly enough to bleed.
2. To first Injury.
The duel was fought until one opponent was injured badly enough that he could not continue the duel.
3. To the Death.
Self-explanatory, the duel was fought until one man died.
After the completion of the duel, the insulted party (if he lived) had to state that he had recieved satisfaction. Had he not, then he could demand another duel.
As mentioned, a duel is a fair fight between two gentlemen. These days people think of fights as bar-brawls or full, one-on-one, street-brawls. Back in the 18th and 19th centuries, the art of proper duelling was a tangle of ettiquite, rules and manners. If you didn't play by the rules, it wasn't a proper duel.
If a gentleman insulted another, for example, calling his wife a whore, then the insulted party had the opportunity to demand a duel. If he did desire a duel, then he would typically tell the other gentleman that he would "demand satisfaction for that insult!".
If the offender refused to duel, the insulted party would accuse the man of cowardice ("Will you duel, or are you a COWARD?") If the other man desired to leave the argument with his honour intact, he would be compelled to say that he would fight the duel ("Then you will have it [satisfaction] sir!").
One rule of duelling is that it is the insulter, and not the instigator of the duel, that can select the weapons. This was only seen as being fair. Once weapons were selected (say, duelling pistols), then a time and a place would be selected for the duel. With the date agreed on, the two men would head their separate ways.
On the date of the duel, both parties were expected to show up, with their pistols loaded and ready. A flintlock pistol is an inaccurate weapon at best. It is slow to reload and has a range of only a few dozen yards, if that. After loading their weapons, the two men would stand back to back, while a second (each man had a 'second', that is, a companion to the duel), would count out the number of paces. A rule of thumb was that the greater the insult - the fewer the paces.
After the paces had been counted, it was up to the men to turn around and fire. If they both missed, they could reload and try again. If one was hit, the injured (or dead) man, lost the duel. Firing to miss DELIBERATELY, was a breech of the rules and the duel was disqualified.
Duelling with swords (which was common even after pistols became the favoured weapon), could be done to three different stages:
1. To first blood.
The duel would start and continue until one opponent was cut badly enough to bleed.
2. To first Injury.
The duel was fought until one opponent was injured badly enough that he could not continue the duel.
3. To the Death.
Self-explanatory, the duel was fought until one man died.
After the completion of the duel, the insulted party (if he lived) had to state that he had recieved satisfaction. Had he not, then he could demand another duel.
No comments:
Post a Comment