Why Democrats Love Illegals
David L. Hunter June 23, 2017
Twice failed candidate Hillary Clinton received
more votes than any unsuccessful presidential candidate in U.S. history.
In the 2016 election, she garnered 2.9 million more
votes than then President-elect Donald Trump. Her popular vote tally
was 65,844,954 (48.2%) to his 62,979,879 (46.1%.), or a 2.1%
differential. Back on November 27, 2016, Trump tweeted, “In addition to
winning the Electoral College [304 to 227, needing 270] in a landslide, I
won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted
illegally.” On balance, that’s likely true.
How many of Hillary’s
ballots were cast illegitimately? Outrageously, that’s still unknown.
Yet today, the jaw-dropping actuality can be reasonably inferred. To
that end, Just Facts, a New Jersey research organization and
conservative/libertarian think tank, suggests that millions of illegals
vote in U.S. elections. Specifically, their analysis of 2008 data from
an extensive Harvard/You Gov survey indicates that 7.9 million noncitizens were illegally registered to vote—and 594,000 to 5.7 million did so.
These figures support a previous Old Dominion University study in which
professors and co-authors Jesse Richman and David Earnest stated that
as many as 2.8 million interlopers voted. Why is this obvious problem—a fundamental threat diluting the people’s voice in elections—“nonexistent” for Democrats?There’s a mutually beneficial relationship between progressives and criminal squatters who vote. Via shared governmental largess—as examples, direct welfare and/or indirect free public school education—the latter achieve a better standard of living than they would in their point of origin. Meanwhile, statistically, Democrats have a built-in voting bloc despite their odious, out of step policies. Why else constantly encourage, and defend, this shadowy influx of 11 million illegal lawbreakers? Likewise, given the common occurrence of terrorism around the globe, why similarly promote unchecked migration, lax law enforcement and borderlessness?
-go to links-
No comments:
Post a Comment