We are gathered here today to once again screw the American citizens - Truth in Legislating

Why not name the Senate Bills after the people the IRS is ruining? Then at least there would be some connection to their waste. m/r

Truth in Legislating :: SteynOnline

by Mark Steyn  •  Feb 11, 2014 

Further to my thoughts on Obama's world without work, how ya gonna keep 'em down on the farm? Food stamps!

First, the new Farm Bill authorizes new spending over the next ten years to the tune of $956 billion. That's $100 billion more than Obama's stimulus bill in 2009. Do our farmers really need to be subsidized at the rate of $95.6 billion per year? The answer is no. You see, this wasn't a Farm Bill, at all. It should have been called the Food Stamp Bill because 79% of the total approved spending ($756 billion) is not to subsidize farmers; but is actually the new budget for Food Stamps.

Most of whose recipients have never been anywhere near a farm, and fall under the US Department of Agriculture for no other reason than that's the department that supervises food production. So why not call it the Food Stamp Bill? As I usually say round about this point in the conversation, say what you like about George III, but the Tea Act was about tea. Why, look, here I am saying it yet again, in relation to "comprehensive" immigration reform, only last June:

So Senator Hoeven and 67 other senators went ahead the following day and approved the usual bazillion-page we-have-to-pass-it-to-find-out-what's-in-it omnibus bill, cooked up in the backrooms, released late on a Friday afternoon and passed in nothing flat after Harry Reid decreed there's no need for further debate — not that anything recognizable to any genuine legislature as "debate" ever occurs in "the world's greatest deliberative body."

Say what you like about George III, but the Tea Act was about tea. The so-called comprehensive immigration reform is so comprehensive it includes special deals for Nevada casinos and the recategorization of the Alaskan fish-processing industry as a "cultural exchange" program, because the more leaping salmon we have the harder it is for Mexicans to get across the Bering Strait. While we're bringing millions of Undocumented-Americans "out of the shadows," why don't we try bringing Washington's decadent and diseased law-making out of the shadows?

Is it really asking too much in a supposed republic of self-governing citizens that a law's title should bear some resemblance to what it's actually about? 

-go to links-