In other words, they are all liars who should not be given any money, ever. A real cut would be the tax payers refusing to pay the trillions extorted from them.
Woodward is a typical D.C. Liberal insider, but the irritatingly oh-so-slow speaking Woodward does not suffer liars lightly, no matter how politically aligned they may be. Here is an example Woodward used exposing Obama as a liar. m/r:
The finger-pointing began during the third presidential debate last fall, on Oct. 22, when President Obama blamed Congress. “The sequester is not something that I’ve proposed,” Obama said. “It is something that Congress has proposed.”
Two Faced
Bob Woodward: Obama’s sequester deal-changer - The Washington Post
By Bob Woodward,
The president and Lew had this wrong. My extensive reporting for my book “The Price of Politics” shows that the automatic spending cuts were initiated by the White House and were the brainchild of Lew and White House congressional relations chief Rob Nabors — probably the foremost experts on budget issues in the senior ranks of the federal government.
Obama personally approved of the plan for Lew and Nabors to propose the sequester to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). They did so at 2:30 p.m. July 27, 2011, according to interviews with two senior White House aides who were directly involved.
Nabors has told others that they checked with the president before going to see Reid. A mandatory sequester was the only action-forcing mechanism they could devise. Nabors has said, “We didn’t actually think it would be that hard to convince them” — Reid and the Republicans — to adopt the sequester. “It really was the only thing we had. There was not a lot of other options left on the table.”
-go to link-
No comments:
Post a Comment