by Marc Schenker Nov. 30, 2010
Bradley Manning may have leaked classified info out of anger at US military’s gay policy. What many media outlets—especially the broadcasters and even cable news (shame on you, Fox News)—are hiding is the fact that the traitorous soldier at the heart of the Wikileaks scandal is a homosexual. It’s not like people won’t be able to find the information about Manning—all it takes is a few, quick Internet searches, but the fact that many are trying hard not to mention his sexual orientation speaks volumes about the political correctness disease in society. Even if news organizations are scared that his treasonous disclosure may lead to anger at that demographic, it is the duty of news outlets to report on his sexuality if it appears that there is a legitimate connection between his "alleged" crime and it. That certainly appears to be the case.
Reports for the last few months only solidify the impression that Manning was an unhappy and vindictive homosexual who tried to get back at the US military by leaking the tons of classified, US info to Wikileaks. Whilethe news outlets are full of nothing but anger directed at the Australian villain, Julian Assange, who clearly hates the US and its military and should therefore be looked at as an enemy by the US, they suspiciously gloss over Manning being a homosexual. It appears the majority of news organizations want to give him a pass because of his sexual orientation, but when so many signs point to it being a primary—if not THE primary—motive for his leaking, then that’s just the height of irresponsibility and PC. To that I say, "Bull!’
Reports even in left-wing outlets like the New York Times have exposed Manning as someone who could be a bitter homosexual man. After all, the article detailed his high-school years where he was made fun of for, in part, being gay. Then, after he joined the US military, he found the atmosphere in the military not to be accepting of his homosexual lifestyle and his liberal opinions, among other things. Consequently, he confided to supposed confidants like the notorious hacker, Adrian Lamo, that he was feeling isolated.
According to more reports in liberal papers like the UK’s Daily Telegraph, before he downloaded all the classified information that he ended up leaking to Wikileaks, Manning would publicly vent on his Facebook page (tough guy, isn’t he?) that he was frustrated, and he also demeaned the US military by making veiled references to them in posts that alleged the term "military intelligence" to be an oxymoron.
As a further, interesting sign, Manning—who is openly homosexual, by the way—was also known to have marched in a gay (homosexual) pride march/parade. If you search the Internet for pictures of him, you can even see ones of him holding up signs demanding "equality" on "the battlefield," battlefield being a likely reference to the US military. To me, and I suspect to many who are not slaves to the dishonesty that is inherent in PC, which gives a pass to gays just because they’re gays, this looks increasingly like a case of a homosexual who was getting more and more bitter at the US military for its "Don’t ask, don’t tell" policy. Then he finally decided to do something about it: treason.
At this point in his selfish and sordid saga of treason, some people are actually lauding this traitor—excuse me, this "alleged" traitor—for being a gay hero. Curiously, despite the fact that Manning was actually an openly homosexual man serving in the military (since he was in a relationship with a male drag queen before being deployed to Iraq!), he was never punished for violating "Don’t ask, don’t tell." The scourge of PC rears its ugly head again, for sure.
Copyright © 2010 by Marc Schenker
Like Marc’s analysis? To subscribe to Marc's articles: Click on the "Subscribe" button above the headline.
To send Marc questions, praise or criticism, you can email him at marc_schenker@telus.net
No comments:
Post a Comment