Obamastan - is he just a default mix of Muslim and Black Liberation Upbringing?

Obama's refusal to even identify, and allow the administration's to identify, Terrorism as Muslim is an outright danger to us all in the west. m/r

"...former Deputy Director of the Counterterrorist Centre for the CIA, as merely ‘angry kids’. Mudd told Charlie Rose:
‘They may be disenfranchised. They may have had a bad experience at school. They may not have friends, and they say, “Look, we want to do something.” This tactic of terrorism is a tactic of the 21st century. I don’t necessarily think these are real jihadi terrorists. I think they’re angry kids.’
You really do have to pinch yourself. How in heaven’s name can a guy like Mudd, with his background in so-called intelligence, possibly come up with anything quite so stupendously shallow?"

Obamastan | Melanie Phillips
By Melanie Phillips May 10, 2013

Fort Hood, Benghazi, the Boston bombings, Iran/Syria, Israel. The pattern is unmistakeable; the danger to America is exponentially increasing; the scandal is deepening into something nearer to a national crisis.

The Obama administration is playing down the Islamist threat to the US and the free world, empowering Islamists at home and abroad, endangering America and betraying its allies -- and covering up its egregious failure to protect the homeland as a result of all the above, while instead blaming America for its own victimisation.

What is coming out in the Benghazi hearings would be jaw-dropping if it had not been apparent from the get-go that the administration failed to protect its own people in the beseiged American mission where Ambassador Chris Stevens and three of his staff were murdered in 2012, then lied about the fact that this was an Islamist attack, and then covered up both its failure and its lie. (Apparent, that is, to some -- but not to the American media, most of which gave the Obama administration a free pass on the scandal in order to ensure the smooth re-election of The One).

-go to link-

Cabal of Leftists and RINOs Attempt to Destroy Heritage Scholar Jason Richwine

I heard this just by accident  today. Rush explains the situation very well.
Why are we allowing this "Gang of Eight," to, in secret, write law that will not only impair, but break America? 
Because that is their plan and it must be stopped along with their other nonsense! m/r

Cabal of Leftists and RINOs Attempt to Destroy Heritage Scholar Jason Richwine - The Rush Limbaugh Show
May 10, 2013

RUSH: Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, I mentioned a name to you working at the Heritage Foundation. His name, Jason Richwine. What is happening to Jason Richwine is inexcusable. What do I often say I do on this program as a means of helping people, new listeners understand what happens here? I get up every day, I do show prep, I watch TV, I read the news. I absorb whatever I can -- and whenever I see the things I believe in under assault, I come here and defend them.BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

Whenever I see people that are involved in advancing the things I believe in under assault, I defend them. So whenever there is an attack on what I believe in, I come here and defend it. When there is somebody that the left is trying to destroy because they are involved in advancing things I believe in, I defend them. But never once do I get up and ask myself, "Who can I attack today?" I'm portrayed as just the opposite, that I come here and I attack.

No, I defend. ...

... Jason Richwine at Harvard wrote a doctoral thesis in which he concluded that the IQ of illegal aliens is lower than natural born residents in the country.  That has been discovered, and he is now being charged with racism and bigotry.  He's out of the Ivy League.  He's got the perfect pedigree.  He comes out of Harvard.  There were a number of people on the review board for his doctoral thesis.  Want to hear some of the names? Michelle Malkin looked into this.  Richwine's dissertation committee at Harvard included George Borjas, a professor of economics and social policy, Cuban born scholar, got his PhD in economics from Columbia.  He's an award-winning labor economist, National Bureau of Economic Research associate.  Has written countless books. 

Jason Richwine's doctoral dissertation

-Go to the links-

Thanks A Lot Ted Kennedy - To fundamentally and literally change the face of America for the worse

The "Gang of Eight" plans for 33 million aliens from Latin America to soon become "chain immigrants" on a new government funded plantation. m/r

The Immigration Transformation | National Review Online

A rational immigration reform would attempt to reorient, not accelerate, current policy.

By  Mark Steyn  May 4, 2013

Most countries in the world have irrelevant numbers of “immigrants.” In the Americas, for example, only Canada, America, and the British West Indies have significant non-native populations. In Mexico, immigrants account for 0.6 percent of the population, and that generally negligible level prevails all the way down through Latin America until you hit a blip of 1.4 percent with Chile and 3.8 percent in Argentina. There’s an isolated exception in Belize, which, like the English Caribbean, has historical patterns of internal migration within the British Commonwealth, such as one sees, for example, in the number of New Zealand–born residents of Australia. But profound sweeping demographic transformation through immigration is a phenomenon only of the Western world in the modern era, and even there America leads the way.

Over 20 percent of all the immigrants on the planet are in the United States. The country’s foreign-born population has doubled in the last two decades to 40 million — officially. Which is the equivalent of Washington taking a decision to admit every single living Canadian, and throwing in the population of New Zealand as a bonus. Thank goodness they didn’t do that, eh? (Whoops.) Otherwise, America would have been subject to some hideous, freakish cultural transformation in which there would be hockey franchises in Florida, and Canadian banks on every street corner in New York trumpeting their obnoxious jingoistic slogans (“TD: America’s neighborhood bank”), and creepy little pop stars with weird foreign names like Justin and Carly Rae doing the jobs America’s teen heartthrobs won’t do. What a vile alien nightmare that would be to wake up in.

Not so very long ago, its national mythology notwithstanding, the United States was little different from most other countries. In 1970, its foreign-born population was 4.7 percent. And, while most of the West has embraced mass immigration in the last half-century, America differs significantly from those developed countries, like Canada and Australia, that favor skilled migrants. Personally, I don’t see what’s so enlightened and progressive about denuding Third World nations of their best and brightest to be your doctors and nurses, but it does demonstrate a certain ruthless self-interest. By contrast the majority of U.S. foreign-born residents now come from Latin America, and more than a quarter of them — 12 million — from Mexico. A policy of “family reunification” will by definition lead to low-skilled immigrants: An engineer or computer scientist is less likely to bring in an unending string of relatives — because his dad’s a millionaire businessman in Bangalore and his brother’s a barrister in London, and they’re both happy and prosperous where they are. Insofar as there is any economic benefit to mass immigration, it’s more than entirely wiped out by chain importation of elderly dependents and other clients for the Big Government state.

-go to link-

Niall Ferguson’s Real Mistake - John Maynard Keynes was a childless, “effete” homosexual

He shouldn't have called the queen “effete.” m/r

Niall Ferguson’s Real Mistake | National Review Online

MAY 8, 2013 12:00 AM

Ideas are not inextricably bound to the lifestyles of their authors. 

By Jonah Goldberg

At an investment conference last week, Harvard historian Niall Ferguson created a huge mess for himself. He glibly speculated that maybe because economist John Maynard Keynes was a childless, “effete” homosexual, he embraced a doctrine that favored immediate economic gratification. Keynes’s bon mot “in the long run, we are all dead” takes on new meaning when you realize he didn’t have kids to worry about.

Following the usual script, but at a much faster clip, an uproar ensued on Twitter and on various blogs. Ferguson quickly offered an apology that rivaled John Cleese’s in A Fish Called Wanda in its abjectness. It was all over before the mob could get their pots of oil to full boil.

Part of Ferguson’s bad luck was to recycle an ancient jibe that many people were too ignorant to know was old hat. Polite people didn’t refer to homosexuality much in public until relatively recently, so the barbs were usually aimed at Keynes’s childlessness. For instance, legendary economist Joseph Schumpeter wrote that Keynes “was childless and his philosophy of life was essentially a short-run philosophy.”

This claim didn’t solely come from gay-bashers and right-wingers. For instance, William Greider, a left-wing writer, argues in Secrets of the Temple: How the Federal Reserve Runs the County that Keynes’s homosexuality contributed to his “defiance of social convention” and served as backdrop for his “rebellion against economic orthodoxy.”

-go to link-

John Stossel: Everything governments run is "Crap"!!!!

John Stossel: Everything governments run is garbage - YouTube

Published on Apr 12, 2012

John Stossel, author and host on Fox Business, talks to Human Events Senior Reporter David Harsanyi about his latest book and the incompetence of government.

iPencil - Most remarkable and it could only happen WITHOUT GOVERNMENT!

Too bad we have a pencil neck president who thinks all thing spring from the government! m/r

I, Pencil

iPencil | National Review Online
Nobody knows how to make a pencil, or a health-care system 

By Kevin D. Williamson from the MAY 20, 2013, ISSUE

Everybody knows the first words spoken on a telephone call — Alexander Graham Bell’s simple demand “Mr. Watson, come here. I want to see you.” April marked the 40th anniversary of the first cell-phone call, which was quite different in tone. Two research teams had been competing to bring the first real consumer cell phone to market, and the first mobile call was placed by Motorola engineer Marty Cooper to his chief rival, Joel Engel of Bell Labs. “Joel, this is Marty,” he said. “I’m calling you from a cell phone.” In other words: “You lose, suckers.”

It took nearly a century to get from Alexander Graham Bell’s conversation to Marty Cooper’s, even though the basic technologies of mobile phones — telephony and radio — date from the 19th century. Conversely, it took only 66 years for mankind to go from the Wright brothers’ flight at Kitty Hawk to Neil Armstrong’s stroll on the moon. Technology does not move in predictable ways.

But it does move.

We treat technological progress as though it were a natural process, and we speak of Moore’s law — computers’ processing power doubles every two years — as though it were one of the laws of thermodynamics. But it is not an inevitable, natural process. It is the outcome of a particular social order.

-go to link-

King of Hypocrisy

Guns are great for his fantasies, fiction and films! Just not we little people in the world of King. m/r

Stephen King and the Second Amendment | National Review Online
His novels tell a different story.

By  Ron Capshaw  May 8, 2013

Not just Guns, Stabbings with Scissors!

Stephen King has declared his support for gun control in an 8,000-word essay published by Amazon. In it, King condemns the NRA and advocates banning guns with more than ten rounds. He even goes beyond Obama’s pledge to protect hunting rifles and calls on hunters to give up “their sporting toys.”

To some extent, King accepts the argument that violent novels can act as a “possible accelerant” to school shootings. Hence, he had the publisher of Rage — a story he wrote about a disgruntled student shooting his algebra teacher and holding a class hostage — pulled from publication.

But these novels also act as an argument for the Second Amendment.

In The Stand, after millions of American citizens are wiped out by a “superflu” created in an Army lab, the libertarian argument of how helpless an unarmed citizenry would be in a country where only criminals and the Army have guns is validated in the book’s black-helicopter America. Televised broadcasts show citizens in a lethal gauntlet between the army on one side and far-left terrorists on the other. Freedom of the press is eradicated as broadcasters are forced to read government propaganda with a gun literally pointed at their heads. The First Amendment is briefly resumed only when the news crew smuggles in guns, but they are soon executed by the more advanced weapons of an invading army.

When survivors are able to arm themselves, much good is done and lives are saved.

-go to link-

Britain never really fit in with the rest of Europe - Boris Johnson: leaving Europe a shot in the arm for democracy

I never thought of Great Britain as European, I don't think Churchill or Thatcher did either. m/r

Boris Johnson: leaving Europe a shot in the arm for democracy - Telegraph

British democracy would receive "a shot in the arm" if the UK left the European Union, Boris Johnson has said.

By Tim Ross, Political Correspondent

09 May 2013

Voters would feel they had regained control over their own destiny if Britain became fully independent from Brussels, the Mayor of London said.

Mr Johnson warned that the country must be ready to "walk away" from Europe if David Cameron failed to negotiate better terms of membership.

Mr Johnson's comments will fuel the increasingly fevered debate inside the Conservative Party about European policy, which has flared after the success of Ukip in last week's local elections.

The Mayor's intervention, at a conference of international business leaders in London, followed an attack from the Prime Minister on Right-wing "pessimists" who believed Britain's relations with Europe could never change.

Mr Cameron is under pressure from his backbench MPs to call a vote in the Commons before the 2015 election on a Bill allowing a referendum on EU membership.

-go to link-

If anybody would know witches it's Debbie Wasserman Schultz & Hillary Clinton

DWS Decries 'Witch-Hunt' Against Hillary | National Review Online

Manslaughter by neglect! Blow-by-Blow: How Obama & Hillary Left Americans to Die

Here is "the difference" from the liars! It is chilling to hear how cold blooded Obama and Clinton are in pursuit of their lying narrative that they've beaten Al-Qaeda to gain their personal political ambitions. m/r


Blow-by-Blow: How Obama & Hillary Left Americans to Die | FrontPage Magazine

By Arnold Ahlert On May 9, 2013 

Wednesday on Capitol Hill, three impeccable witnesses offered the clearest evidence to date that the Obama administration’s response to Benghazi before, during and after the terrorist attack that claimed the lives of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, State Department employee Sean Smith, and former Navy SEALs Glen A. Doherty and Tyrone S. Woods, was a deadly combination of ineptitude, political calculations, and outright lying. Mark Thompson, acting deputy assistant Secretary of State for counterterrorism; Greg Hicks, former deputy chief of mission in Libya; and Eric Nordstrom, former regional security officer in Libya, offered unshakeable testimony, despite efforts by several Democratic lawmakers to protect both the current administration and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, their party’s most viable presidential candidate for 2016. What the witnesses averred reveals a grim web of deceit likely orchestrated by Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama to cover up the order to ground U.S. rescue teams that could have easily saved our besieged countrymen in Benghazi.
Some of the most compelling and emotional testimony was provided by Hicks, who offered the House Oversight and Government Reform committee a damning blow-by-blow account of the September 11, 2012 attack: In Tripoli at the time, Hicks recounted how he had spoken with Stevens early in the evening, and there was no sign of unusual activity. After relaxing for a while, he got an alert that Benghazi was under attack. When he checked his cell phone he saw two numbers, one of which he didn’t recognize. He called that number first and got Stevens on the phone. “Greg! We’re under attack!” said Stevens, according to Mr. Hicks.
Later, when it became clear that Stevens was missing, the first concern was that he had been taken by terrorists. “We began to hear also that the ambassador’s been taken to a hospital,” said Hicks. “We learn that it is in a hospital which is controlled by Ansar al-Shariah, the group that Twitter feeds had identified as leading the attack on the consulate.” As this information was coming in, a “response team” from Tripoli arrived at the Benghazi airport, one that Hicks thought might become involved in a “hostage rescue” operation, even as officials worried they were being “baited into a trap.”
Hicks then spoke of the mortars that landed on the compound shortly after a group of Americans fleeing the consulate arrived at the annex. The first mortar landed among a group of Libyans who had helped bring the Americans to safety. “The next was short,” he said. “The next three landed on the roof.”
Those were the mortars that killed Doherty and Woods.
Hicks was visibly choked up when he recounted learning about Stevens’ death from the Libyan prime minister. ”I think it’s the saddest phone call I’ve ever had in my life,” he said.
In one of the most stunning portions of the hearing, Hicks confirmed the chilling refusal of the Obama administration to send in readily available U.S. assets to stop the consulate slaughter. This order to “stand down” was given not once, but at least twice.
-go to link-