“The elevation of political correctness over sound investigative judgment certainly explains the failure to identify Maj. Hasan as a terrorist.”

Only in Obamaland could this Muslim Terrorist Attack in an Army Base be deemed "workplace violence". m/r 

Fort Hood Victims Get Purple Hearts At Last

By Lloyd Billingsley On April 15, 2015  In Daily Mailer,FrontPage

More than five years after U.S. Army major Nidal Hasan ^[1] gunned down 13 soldiers and wounded more than 30 others at Fort Hood, Texas, victims finally received Purple Heart medals in an April 10 ceremony ^[2] at the base. The long delayed award of these medals, however, does not bring closure to this issue.

Hasan, an Army psychiatrist, had been emailing terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki about the prospect of killing infidel American soldiers, and the “Soldier of Allah,” as he called himself, did everything but take out an ad on the Super Bowl to announce his jihadist intentions. Government agents were aware of his communications but did nothing to stop him.

President Barack Obama’s first response to Hasan’s mass murder was brief, low key, and failed to ascribe any responsibility to Islamic terrorism. “We cannot fully know what leads a man to do such a thing,” the president said. Such breathtaking denial soon became official policy. ^[3] The Obama administration’s Department of Defense issued Protecting the Force: Lessons from Fort Hood, which contains not a single reference to jihad or jihadists. Its only mention of “Islamic” is an endnote reference to “Countering Violent Islamic Extremism,” a 2007 FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin.

The Fort Hood attack claimed more than twice as many victims as the first attack on the World Trade Center in 1993. It was the worst mass murder at a U.S. Army facility and Hasan yelled “Allahu Akbar” as he gunned down unarmed soldiers, yet the Obama administration preferred to call it “workplace violence.” 

-go to links-