EPA Regulations will Save the World (until Global Cooling Change next year) Polar Bear-Faced Lie

'Change' regulates the Polar Bear

Why not just call every readymade pre-regulatory crisis 'CHANGE'. Then there won't be a need for cumbersome adjectives and nouns like Global, Climate, Anthropogenic or even HOAX. Then it will fit into the Orwellian world of Newspeak nicely. It will work for all the crises that the EPA and the other agencies feel their deep seeded need to control. m/r

Polar Bear-Faced Lie :: SteynOnline

by Mark Steyn  June 2, 2014

The Environmental Protection Agency's new "rules" aren't really funny - either for what they say about the US Constitution, the separation of powers and representative government; or in the context of the US economy's one per cent "shrinkage" announced only last week and its prospects in the years ahead.

Nonetheless, I confess I got a laugh out of this sub-headline at The Guardian:

New EPA rules spur prospects for deal to end climate change

A "deal to end climate change": That's how easy it is, folks. It's like negotiating with the Taliban. You can strike a "deal", and it'll "end" climate change. I wondered initially whether even Guardian sub-editors believe that's how it works. But, on reflection, I think it is. These guys have auto-brainwashed, and so thoroughly vacuumed from their skulls the very possibility of natural climate variability that they seriously think politicians seated round a table can "end" climate change.

We have had a pause in "global warming" now for approaching two decades. That's to say, if you're graduating from high school in the next few days, there's been no global warming since you were in your bassinet. But it doesn't feel like that, does it? Because you've had climate change shoved down your throat your entire life. 

-go to links-