And the Scam Goes On - Study suggesting global warming is exaggerated was rejected for publication in respected journal because it was 'less than helpful' to the climate cause, claims professor

Why let facts get in the way when lies an get corrupt international and national politicians unbridled power, control and funds based on lies, scams and manipulated data. m/r

Study suggesting global warming is exaggerated was rejected for publication in respected journal because it was 'less than helpful' to the climate cause, claims professor | Mail Online

By BEN SPENCER May 15, 2014

Professor Lennart Bengtsson claims his study on global warming has been rejected as it might fuel climate scepticism

Says he suspects an intolerance of dissenting views on climate science 

Paper suggests that climate is less sensitive to greenhouse gases than previously thought

A scientific study which suggests global warming has been exaggerated was rejected by a respected journal because it might fuel climate scepticism, it was claimed last night.

The alarming intervention, which raises fears of ‘McCarthyist’ pressure for environmental scientists to conform, came after a reviewer said the research was ‘less than helpful’ to the climate cause.

Professor Lennart Bengtsson, a research fellow at the University of Reading and one of five authors of the study, said he suspected that intolerance of dissenting views on climate science was preventing his paper from being published.

‘The problem we now have in the climate community is that some scientists are mixing up their scientific role with that of a climate activist,’ he told the Times.

Prof Bengtsson’s paper suggests that the Earth’s environment might be much less sensitive to greenhouse gases than previously thought.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2630023/Study-suggesting-global-warming-exaggerated-rejected-publication-respected-journal-helpful-climate-cause-claims-professor.html#ixzz31sxt6kxI Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook